June 24, 2008 - 1:28pm

Rendell may make a weak #2 for same reason John McCain would have in 2000

As talk heats up about vice-presidential candidates and names are floated, Ed Rendell may make the best case for why he should not be chosen. 

In 2000, after John McCain’s strong primary challenge to George Bush, some pundits talked about McCain as Bush’s running mate.  Those close to McCain will tell you themselves he would have been a poor choice.  One of the key qualities of a good VEEP is they need to be able to take direction and execute as they are told to.  The same reason McCain would have been a poor choice for Bush when you are looking for someone to mimic the agenda, Rendell would be a poor choice for the same reason.

Rendell proved during the presidential primary he could be a good soldier for a short time, as he was for Hillary Clinton, but over a long campaign where Barack Obama will want someone he can trust to stay 100% on message, Rendell may be a poor choice.   

More Inside Edge 

Comments

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <blockquote> <b> <i> <p> <br> <span> <img> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <h5> <h6>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Images can be added to this post.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.